🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.